by Karl Denninger
In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.
The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable.
Of course it is.
Why is it that none of these so-called “betters”, you know, elected leaders, ever took a single physics class? Did none of them ever pass Algebra?
Oh, they did?