by Chris Powell
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
There’s nothing terribly profound or incisive about the commentary in today’s Financial Times that is appended here. But simply that the FT published something making the obvious case for gold is nearly astounding. What’s next — the capture of the Loch Ness monster, UFOs landing at Stonehenge, or an FT reporter committing actual journalism by putting an inconvenient question to a central banker about surreptitious intervention in the gold market?